> The polyparse darcs repo includes the text of the licence in the LICENCE-LGP= > L file. I apologise for the oversight which means the licence text is not i= > ncluded in the cabal package. It is LGPL version 2.1. I am not an expert o= > n whether LGPL 2.1 permits a later LGPL licence to be applied instead, but i= > t does appear to permit conversion to GPL 2 or later. I presume this means t= > he later versions of the LGPL are not automatically allowed.
Yes, they are not automatically forward-safe, unfortunately. But it is good thing to add 'or any later version (at your option)' clause. There is essay about compatibility, it may be of use. One day I saw table of license compatibilies, but can't find it now. https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-compatibility.html Just to be sure (my english is not native), is it true, that polyparse is licensed under terms of Lesser GNU General Public License, version 2.1 or later (at my option)? -- Accept: text/plain, text/x-diff Accept-Language: eo,en,ru X-Keep-In-CC: yes X-Web-Site: sinsekvu.github.io
