Hi,
>or we have to remove packages a bit more aggressively. Packages that >are still not compatible with 8.0 do likely not have an active enough >maintainer for our standards. > >This in in particular has been fixed. > >We should at least start staging in the repo and/or experimental (but >it is easy to say for me who has been inactive the last few months… >(besides scheduling binNMUs)) > >At this point: Thanks a lot Clint for taking the lead lately! I sent a mail for the llvm-3.8 issue, my proposal is: - ghc point to 3.8 for arm* - transition to unstable for stretch - remove armel for Stretch what do you think about? I admit, removing llvm-3.5,3.6,3.7 and keeping only 3.8 and 3.9 for Stretch is a nice thing, and armel is likely to be removed for Buster if things can't keep working on that architecture (I remember armel stack being removed already once) G.
