Hi Jonas, On Thu, Oct 18, 2018 at 08:23AM, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > Why do you try upgrade to Pandoc 2.3.1 when that is not supported by > BlogLiterally?
>From what you said, I understood that you had pandoc-2.3.1 ready to be uploaded, so I tested it against the current set of Haskell packages to see whether it was compatible or not. I couldn't know that until I had tested it. > I would guess that the solution is to simply request a > binNMU of Pandoc - not touch its source at all for that migration. I agree with you. We should stay with pandoc-2.2.1 for the time being. It seems that binNMUs will not work, since pandoc build-depends on libghc-tasty-dev (< 1.1), but 1.1.0.3 is available on unstable. Could you please fix that? P.S. pandoc's build-dependencies are now available on unstable, hopefully. If this is not the case, please let me know. Thanks! -- Ilias
