Ulrich Drepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > You never should have GLIBC_2.0 symbols. The shlib-versions file > should have GLIBC_2.2 as the earliest version (third column).
Ah, I see what the problem is. It seems that it is my fault :( I take it that libc.so, libm.so, and ld.so should all be versioned with GLIBC_2.2 as the base, then? -- [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.linuxcare.com/ Linuxcare. Support for the revolution.
