To All - Ref: Kernel snap-shot of 0603 (presumed similar to V0.9 kernel)
Found: File: linux/include/asm-parisc/io.h Lines: 27 - 40 Do: Comment out the #ifdef at (appox.) line 27 and matching #endif at (appox) line 40 Situation (sitrep): Box model 720 doesn't have PCI BA - Box model 720 EISA BA was an option (mine has one, I don't have a card, so I am not building that driver.) Without either BA's defined - in/out Byte, Word, Long does not have a prototype in mem.c (amoung other places) - the compiler guesses (incorrectly) at what inb() and outb() mean. Makes a difference. More to follow as I work my way through: serial.c pc_keyb.c lasi_82596.c parport_gsc.c scsi.c sim700.c inode.c array.c binfmt_som.c binfmt_elf.c and various other bits and bytes. Hey - No one ever said this was a clean build, did they? Mike On Tue, 05 Jun 2001, you wrote: > On Tue, Jun 05, 2001 at 09:14:05AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > On Tue, 5 Jun 2001, Richard Hirst wrote: > > > > > So with the nfsroot you have the D310 booting, but with the 0.9 ISO > > > it stops after serial driver initialisation. > > > > No, if I boot off the cd, I get IPL errors. When I netboot the kernel off > > the cd, it stopped at serial init. I don't think it actually stopped, I > > think it no longer printed but still booted. > > Ah, ok. I'd misunderstood you. So the kernel on the CD is no > different from the one you built yourself. That's a relief! > > Have you checked both serial ports, just in case the one the > kernel finds isn't the one you are using? > > From the boot msgs you sent earlier, it looks like you turned > SERIAL_DEBUG_AUTOCONF on. Does it actually run the loopback > test at serial.c:3671 successfully? > > Richard > > > > _______________________________________________ > parisc-linux mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.parisc-linux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/parisc-linux
