Carlos O'Donell wrote:
> > Because the glibc from unstable immediately showed this "feature"
> > while I had hoped that the one from testing was more or less fine.
> > testing has 2.2.5-14.3 and unstable has 2.3.1-5 (for hppa).
> ^^^ had ;)
still has:
auric!joey(pts/17):~> elmo -e -a hppa -d unstable libc6
libc6 unstable 2.3.1-5 hppa
auric!joey(pts/17):~>
> I relaxed this requirement in -6. Please upgrade and report to the list :)
Show me the .debs and I could try.
Regards,
Joey
--
Testing? What's that? If it compiles, it is good, if it boots up, it is
perfect.
Please always Cc to me when replying to me on the lists.
