> In other words, the next Debian release based on gcc 3.5 or later > will require a 2.6 parisc kernel?
Not require, but some features will only work properly with a 2.6.x kernel. Some features may cause unexpected behaviors with 2.4 kernels. Let me explain this in a bit more detail. As Dave mentioned, there is a case in gcc which is currently broken when running 2.4 kernels, because sigcontext handling was broken in 2.4 kernels for 64-bit kernels. Carlos fixed this in 2.6.x (thanks Carlos). The signal trampoline layout also changed in 2.6.x kernels, breaking backward compatibility for userspace applications that need to process the signal context structure. This has come up not only for gcc but for some other applications (this topic comes up from time to time on debian-hppa). Currently there is code in gcc to handle 32-bit 2.4 kernels, 32-bit 2.6 kernels and 64-bit 2.6 kernels. However, it appears that with 2.4 kernels there are still some bugs related to either mmap, signal handling or unaligned trap handling that causes the gcc testsuite to hang the machine from time to time. If you run a 64-bit 2.4 kernel than some of the gcc unwinding stuff will not work at all. It is certainly possible to fix this, if someone is so inclined.... but there are many bugs to fix in 2.6, and i still have 70+ gdb bugs to fix :) so it'll have to be someone else.... In a grand scheme of things, there is just a small portion of userspace that will not work properly with a 2.4 kernel. Probably 95+% of users will not notice... but it is still broken, and we need to make sure this is clear and people understand that if something doesn't work, the only "solution" may be to upgrade to 2.6.x kernels (unless someone steps up to say they will maintain the 2.4.x kernel series for hppa). gcc is just one example of where this will come up, there are probably some other cases where things will be fixed with 2.6 kernels and won't work with 2.4. I don't think anyone will break anything intentionally for 2.4, but most of the active developers are probably doing most of their work on 2.6, so 2.4 is not nearly as well tested. I should also point out that, really, this is nothing new, we've probably been operating in this mode for the last year; it's just never been made explicit.. :) thanks, randolph -- Randolph Chung Debian GNU/Linux Developer, hppa/ia64 ports http://www.tausq.org/
