On Sun, Feb 27, 2005 at 08:55:41AM -0500, Harry Cochran wrote: > On Sat, Feb 26, 2005 at 1:12AM -0500, Grant Grundler wrote: > >ls -l /boot > SinoHub5:/# ls -l /boot > total 0 > > >The "ls" command assumes the f0 partition is mounted on /boot. > > Well I was feeling pretty good until I saw ls -l /boot come back with total > 0. I assume that's bad news. You didn't say to change init-partitioned to > update-partitioned, so maybe I screwed up there. Should I have just gotten > rid of that line?
If sda1 is mounted on /boot and it is empty, then yes, that's bad. If I understand correctly, --init-partition formats the partition, and as a result, clears any files that were it previously held... If that's right, it's better to pass --init-partition to palo, than it is to add --init-partition in palo.conf, since you won't have to worry about changing it back afterwards. You'll have to copy the files from /boot again (using /mnt for sda1, making sure you've unmounted /boot first). -- Stuart Brady -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
