On Sun, Jun 03, 2007 at 09:02:24PM -0400, John David Anglin wrote: > > I don't think so. There's some wierd stuff in check_ivt. It looks > like the function is trying to see if it can compute a checksum for > the os_hpmc function without causing a panic. However, the function > pointer stuff is all wrong. Note that 32 and 64-bit function pointer > handling is completely different. >
Er, then why didn't it complain before? Can you do a quick test if I cook up a patch? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
