On Tue, Jul 17, 2007 at 01:04:38AM +0200, Angelo Machils wrote: > > On 16-jul-2007, at 20:24, Grant Grundler wrote: > >> On Mon, Jul 16, 2007 at 08:44:49AM +0200, Angelo Machils wrote: >> ... >>> I'm sorry to say so, but apparently it *is* possible. uname -r gives >>> me a 2.4.xxxxx kernel as response. I did do an install of 3.0r4 and >>> *then* a dist-upgrade to 4.0rx, perhaps that is the reason. >> >> It is. AFAICT, parisc will not replace the kernel in any sort of upgrade. >> You have to modify palo.conf by hand to point at the new kernel and >> run "palo" manually. > > Ahhhh okay, I understand :) Well, the fact that I have to modify the file. > But that would mean that there should already be a new kernel somewhere on > the /boot partition?! Which is just not (yet) included in the conf file?
yes, there should be - assuming /boot was created and mounted properly. If not, hunt for the right linux-image (32-bit UP) and install it. > >> BTW, for now, do not use 2.6.18 SMP kernels. I believe fixes went into >> 2.6.22 that help make parisc SMP stable again. > > Would SMP kernels be even installed on a A180C, which is not a > multi-processing box?! probably not. But this is going to a mailing list...warning is for others too. > My sources.list now is: > debian1:/etc/apt# more sources.list > > deb cdrom:[Debian GNU/Linux 4.0 r0 _Etch_ - Official hppa DVD Binary-3 > 20070407- > 19:19]/ unstable contrib main Ok. I just find it odd that "unstable" is used for etch DVD builds. Normally I would expect to see "stable" or "testing" (for prerelease) there. hth, grant -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
