Kevin B. McCarty wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 06, 2008 at 09:48:45AM +0200, Rafael Laboissiere wrote: >>> In order to complete the g77 -> gfortran transition [1], the following >>> packages need to be built on hppa [2]: geant321, mclibs, mn-fit, paw, >>> ghemical, libghemical, scalapack, and petsc (geant321 and mn-fit >>> build-depend on paw; ghemical build-depends on libghemical) >>> >>> Could these packages be binNMUed, please? > > Luk Claes wrote: > >> As you can see on [2] they are all either in Needs-Build or in Dep-Wait, >> so they are not broken, will be built eventually and don't need binNMUs... > > Some of these packages have been waiting to be built on hppa for more > than 30 days. Is it likely that the hppa buildd situation will improve > in the near future? The graph at [3] indicates that hppa was slowly > making a comeback but now (as of 2008-04-06) has stalled again.
At the moment there should be 3 buildds running instead of the 1 earlier... > I (and I'm sure others) would be very grateful if someone who would not > mind building the above packages on their own hppa machine could upload > them, as was apparently done with cernlib [4]. Note that circumventing the buildds can mean that your package won't be security supported on that architecture... Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
