On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 03:30:26PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote: > On Tue, Jun 17, 2008 at 07:25:17PM +0200, Thibaut VARENE wrote: > > I don't blame you for saying that, but it seemed to me that Debian > > (contrary to some other well known derivative) wasn't focusing only on > > "lively" architectures and allowed "dead" ones to get a second life. > > And it's not as if PA-RISC machines had only the horsepower of some > > high end m68k box... ;P > > > > The skills you learn working on a port, whether active, or something > that should have been smelted back from whence it came, are invaluable > experience in the technology field. > > I don't think anyone would disagree that the practical debugging skills, > and general know-how are applicable to far more than just parisc.
This is very attractive and I am still tempted.. thank you ;) If it were my way to kernel... ciao, domenico -----[ Domenico Andreoli, aka cavok --[ http://www.dandreoli.com/gpgkey.asc ---[ 3A0F 2F80 F79C 678A 8936 4FEE 0677 9033 A20E BC50 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
