[ Please Cc me as I'm not subscribed to the list. ] On 2009-05-14, Steve M. Robbins <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, May 13, 2009 at 05:37:36PM +0200, Domenico Andreoli wrote: >> On 5/12/09, Steve M. Robbins <[email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > No other arch failed to copy these files, and the previous build (-5) >> > on hppa [2] exhibited no such trouble. The only difference between >> > -5 and -6 is a debian/control change to a conflicts specification. I >> > blame the build daemon. Can someone have a look? >>=20 >> indeed it built successfully on my hppa box. > Thanks, Domenico. > Could the powers-that-be please reschedule boost1.38 on hppa?
Please Cc [email protected] next time. I just discovered this mail by chance. I rescheduled it yesterday in order to get more build material for a "new" hppa buildds (paer)[*] and it built successfully. Sadly, in other news, paer suffers from random segfaults, too. This makes building quite unreliable, but at least the machine does not crash like our other buildds (peri and penalosa) do. It would be nice if someone could debug this, as it makes buildd maintainance fairly unpleasant. (In this case the buildd is freely accessible for DDs but still that does not help much because it's random. We saw more segfaults in unstable builds than in stable and oldstable builds. Does that mean that the glibc in unstable could have its hands in the game? If so, the sid chroot on the porter machine could be used for data gathering.) Kind regards, Philipp Kern [*] Which is actually also our porterbox. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
