On 2010-09-23, Thibaut VARÈNE <[email protected]> wrote: > I think it's been sufficiently documented on this m-l that hppa is/was > in a releasable state (d-i works, upgrade works, etc) so this is > mostly moot, and the cause of my personal disinterest for Debian given > the way things were handled.
as long as we need to have a usleep(1000) in the threading code in Qt for happa because of lowlevel bugs in order to just have things working a bit, I don't think hppa is in a releasable state. I haven't heard of any progress on that issue for very long. /Sune -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
