On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 10:19:03AM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > I've sent an alternative implementation to solve this problem, that I > think is cleaner, clearer and less intrusive.
As I said on debian-dpkg [1], you haven't explained why using DEB_*_GNU_CPU and DEB_*_GNU_SYSTEM variables (like we've done for the past 6 years since Marcus wrote dpkg-architecture) is unclean or intrusive. [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-dpkg/2005/01/msg00197.html -- .''`. Proudly running Debian GNU/kFreeBSD unstable/unreleased (on UFS2+S) : :' : `. `' http://www.debian.org/ports/kfreebsd-gnu `- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
