Roland McGrath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > When I get to the > libc hacking, I'll discuss it on libc-hacker and with Mark.
Is that the list where one can be notified of new libc alpha releases? That would be swell... > There will probably be some shared library version problems between the > current intermediate states, your debian package state with Mark's patches, > and what I end up with for a "finished" glibc-2.1 hurd version. But we can I noticed there's something going on with the versioning when I tried to install 2.0.96. I assume a goal is binary compatibility with 2.0, no? > just deal, and bump the numbers several times if need be. With debian Oh, so then nothing will explode if we have a 2.0.100? > packages set up, it should not be so bad to have to rebuild everything. -- John Tobey, late nite hacker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\\ No law of supply and demand can resist the laws of physics. /// ]]] Eventually, software development will reach the ground state. [[[ /// Support Free Software! \\\
