From: Edmund GRIMLEY EVANS <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: partition names Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 10:16:11 +0000
> Is the following table correct? > > Linux GRUB Mach/Hurd > > hda (hd0) ? > hda1 (hd0,0) hd0s1 > hda2 (hd0,1) hd0s2 > ... This is a correct table: Linux GRUB Mach/Hurd (ext2fs) Mach/Hurd (ufs) hda (hd0) hd0 hd0 hda1 (hd0,0) hd0s1 hd0a hda2 (hd0,1) hd0s2 hd0b The questions of device-naming are too many. Is it better to change how to name devices? Especially, the difference between ext2fs partition and ufs partition is confusing for Hurd beginners. ---------------------------------------------------------------------- ~o o~ OKUJI Yoshinori <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> s ) http://duff.kuicr.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~okuji (check "okuji.asc" !)
pgpLZARDD7tAM.pgp
Description: PGP signature
