"M.C. Vernon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Well, it would seem heretical to infect a Hurd-specific part of glibc > > with the string "/usr", unless perhaps we have vendor=debian. I vote > > for /usr/lib -> /lib and crossing our fingers. > > Heresy is often a good thing. I would rather have glibc that will make > things work without any more symlinks, rather than have /lib -> /usr/lib > as a hack, which may produce bugs later. > > Matthew
I'm not sure what significance the following has for debian-hurd, but it can't hurt my argument :) so I'll mention it: Solaris has /lib as a symlink to ./usr/lib . -John
