Raul Miller wrote:
> M.C. Vernon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I (and some other Cambridge people) am of the opinion that the current > > hurd doesn't get the maximum benefit out of it's microkernel design, and > > one of the reasons is that its microkernel is not very micro. > > Other than size, what benefits? Fair question. Answer - simpler kernel (less prone to design and implementation errors) together with a generalized random-access device interface (greater generalization means the ability to service a greater range of devices) means a "better" O/S to me.
