Checa esto. Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >>>>> Oliver Thuns writes: > > OT> What a the pros and cons between Debian/Hurd and Debian/Linux > > Currently, GNU/Hurd is not as useful as GNU/Linux. > > Server applications vs. multimedia applications do not matter nearly > as much as whether your application is single-threaded and monolithic, > or multithreaded and modular. > > When the Hurd is more stable, it will be much more efficient for > threaded, CORBA-based applications because of Mach's lightweight > threading and message-passing facilities. This will require a free > IDL translator that uses Mach RPC, though, which to my knowledge does > not exist (yet). > > Also, every Hurd server is roughly equivalent to a CORBA object, and > so it would be possible to eventually eliminate a lot of glibc glue > code from GNOME, Berlin, etc, and just use Hurd interface calls > directly. > > The potential is for a faster, more modular system. However, software > that uses only the standard Unix glibc calls will always run slower > than that which takes advantage of the Hurd's architecture. > > -- > Gordon Matzigkeit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> //\ I'm a FIG (http://www.fig.org/) > Committed to freedom and diversity \// I use GNU (http://www.gnu.org/) > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Rafael Sep�lveda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Grupo de Usuarios de GNU/Linux de Monterrey <http://monterrey1.linux.net.mx>
