Dale Scheetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Sorry, I sometimes mistake Debian's implimentation with the standard. I > still see an implication that the two are distinct and separate, although > it is, indeed, vague.
It was an intentional part of FSSTND (because I am a participant in FSSTND) to make sure that /usr -> / is permitted. > I suspect that vi is only a tiny part of the problem of linking /usr to /. > This not only makes /usr/bin isomorphic to /bin, but /usr/lib and /lib, > and /usr/sbin and /sbin also get overlapped. I can't believe that ae > represents the only file overlap in that whole collection. Actually, vi is the only problem thus far.
