On Tue, Jun 01, 1999 at 04:52:09AM -0700, Craig Brozefsky wrote: > > Hmm, this is interesting. I see in another response to your message > that it is a possible libtool issue. Could someone give me a > suggestion as to how the rules file should handle this? is there some > way I can force libtool to use a consistent versioning scheme?
As Mark said, he will fix this in libtool. You are right, it is bad that our debian/rules files are very dependant on the actual files produced by a package. This hits me everytime someone hard codes i486-linux in the script for example. The best we can do is to fix as many linuxisms as we can, and keep the files generic. For example, use *.so.* to move the links and *.so to move the library itself. This helps a bit. Thanks, Marcus -- "The purpose of Free Software is Free Software. The End and the Means are the same." -- Craig Sanders Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
