On Tue, 8 Jun 1999, Marcus Brinkmann wrote: > Okay, so the shlibdeps info in the gdb binary is not correct. I will soon > update gdb and make sure it is okay
Doesn't dh_shlibdeps work under Hurd or what? > You will want hurd-dev anyway, so it's not a loss :) No, but faulty dependecies are always a problem since a new user (like me) doesn't know which package is missing.. > I will try to take a look at apt myself. The architecture stuff is something > I am particulary concerned with, and this should be done right... I wonder > how apt determines the installation architecture. It's fairly straighforward.. check in the configure.in for the section about architectures. (search for ARCHITECTURE) > > Another thing I discovered is that the Hurd bails out totally if it runs > > out of memory. But I guess this is quite known? ;) > Use swap. Use even more swap. That helps alot. Yeah, but I still don't think it should _crash_ when it runs out of memory..
