In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>How does the following sound:
>
>NFS does not allow passive translators.  They are not stored; the call
>fails.  If the user wants to set up passive translators, e can use
>shadowfs to slap a writable filesystem over top.  If the user is using
>a diskless machine, the startup scripts can create the correct passive
>translatos on a RAM filesystem, say from a tar file.

That would mean hurd cannot be used on diskless systems.

>Alternatively, when a passive translator is "saved", what is actually
>stored is simply a command line, no?  Perhaps one could simply store
>that in some file on the NFS server (possibly even some automagically
>named file).  One could possibly even arrange
>it so that a non-Hurd-extended server could cope with these files.

What I would like is if all of the above could be implemented
in the client without requiring any changes to the server...
(Actually I think that is what you have suggested).

-- 
Brian May <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Attachment: pgpoMlas8xIP7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to