That's why I don't agree with stallman, but that is all that I've heard from him on the subject.
On Sun, 5 Mar 2000, Olivier Galibert wrote: > On Fri, Mar 03, 2000 at 11:03:06PM -0600, Matthias Granberry wrote: > > The problem is that it's not legally secured. It's a cover-your-ass > > thing. And I think that stallman is a bit rabid on this, but don't kill > > me for this... > > FSF Emacs is not legally secured either. Check all the mule-related files. > > Gnumach is not legally secured. > > Linux is not legally secured. > > Should I continue? > > OG. > > >
