Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Fri, May 19, 2000 at 01:24:13PM +0200, Tomasz Wegrzanowski wrote: > > 1. > > How accurate are 1987-1989 CMU Mach papers if GNU Mach is considered. > > Depends entirely on what specific issue you look at. > For example, the Hurd has no nameserver, but it has (still) > cthreads, and the client/server basics are of course the same.
The Hurd almost had a nameserver, until Roland pointed out that we should just use the filesystem for that.
