Adam Sampson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) said:
> On Sat, Jul 15, 2000 at 12:16:14AM -0700, Shawn wrote:
> > I say screw VTs. screen kicks soooo much ass, VTs are a waste of
> > time.
>
> Hear, hear. All we need is a console driver which is fast and supports
> a sufficient subset of the VT220 to get screen running; we can then avoid
> all the complexity than Linux's console has to put up with.
while i agree screen is very nice, it's not very useful when using graphical
applications (which i often do, using Linux' framebuffer).
which brings up another point: will the Hurd's console ever be capable of
doing graphics? i.e. will i ever be able to draw a pixel on the screen
without having to be suid root somewhere along the line?
--
/"\ m i k e b u r r e l l
\ / ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X AGAINST HTML MAIL,
/ \ AND NEWS TOO, dammit
