From: Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: porting to Hurd Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 02:06:17 +0100
> > At present I succeeded in building jtex-bin, xdvik-ja, vflib2 > > nkf, dvi2tty. I hope I could build new tetex packages which > > are not in consistent state right now. > > That's great! It's also good that you post your intention about tetex, so no > effort is made twice. I am positively surprised that more people are porting > packages right now. Jeff, can you both agree on who does tetex? But please don't expect so much on me ;-) I am not an expert on computer/Linux/Hurd... I will try but I might fail to do something. > > It is very helpful if ftp://alpha.gnu.org/ provides xfonts-cjk > > of potato version, IMHO. > > Ah, mmh. Please check out if the problem would be solved by X 4.0 in the > Debian archive proper. I plan to do an X upgrade next week (this time > properly). Okay, I will wait for your upgrade and check it. > [Jeff, see below on tetex] Oh! sorry but I am completely new to Hurd so I don't know Jeff is working on tetex. From: Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: porting to Hurd Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2001 17:20:39 -0800 > The tetex that I built has no X support right now. I can spin up new > ones tonight with that support, which Marcus told me is the Right Thing. > If that is too long for you (Like, it's blocking you *now*) then do it, > and post an email. I will not do it then. Please go ahead, Jeff. It is enough for me if libkpathsea problem is fixed on tetex and it helps me much if you build tetex because I can concentrate on jtex-bin and/or more Japanese specific packages. Thanks both of you. Best Regards, 2001.2.28 -- Debian Developer & Debian JP Developer - much more I18N of Debian Atsuhito Kohda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Department of Math., Tokushima Univ.
