On Mon, Mar 05, 2001 at 07:51:42PM +0100, Robert Bihlmeyer wrote: > Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I will hack together a dpkg-shlibdeps for us to use in the meanwhile. We > > just have to remember to use that instead the dpkg-dev version. Mmmh. I > > think a diversion could work. I think a package is overkill. Is it possible > > to specify diversions without making a proper package containing them? > > Where would you put the correct dpkg-shlibdeps, if not in a package?? > I think bundling it in the hurd package, and doing "dpkg-divert --add > --package hurd --rename --divert /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps.broken > /usr/bin/dpkg-shlibdeps" would be fine.
I would just have posted it on the list and let people type in the command above, or a similar one. Bundling it with the hurd is a neat idea though. I just don't want to make it the catch all bucket for Debian deficiency work-arounds :) Marcus -- `Rhubarb is no Egyptian god.' Debian http://www.debian.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marcus Brinkmann GNU http://www.gnu.org [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.marcus-brinkmann.de
