On Mon, Mar 26, 2001 at 07:59:16AM +0000, Philip Charles wrote: > > > ae-962-30 is not working (broken?), however ae in the tarball does work. > > > So the ae-962-30 is being transfered to the second CD, if not removed > > > completely. > > > > I just tested this on my system and it works for me, can you give me > > details? > > Fortunately my test box was still running with the Hurd. > > ae: error while loading shared libraries: libslang.so: cannot load shared > object file: No such lile or directory. > > slang-1.4.4-1 is installed.
Hmmm... If you still have it running, can you check the following: (You can do this from Linux) [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hurd/bin$ md5sum ae a5f9d9dd564881943ceef3a03d8eda33 ae [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hurd/bin$ objdump -p ae (Some stuff removed) Dynamic Section: NEEDED libslang.so NEEDED libc.so.0.2 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hurd/lib$ md5sum libslang.so.1.4.4 1ebab7c21925e2492c49cd0fb0ee8ce0 libslang.so.1.4.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hurd/lib$ ls -al libslang* -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 571434 Mar 24 13:50 libslang.a lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 22 Mar 25 23:09 libslang.so -> /lib/libslang.so.1.4.4 lrwxr-xr-x 1 root root 17 Mar 25 23:09 libslang.so.1 -> libslang.so.1.4.4 -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 348516 Mar 24 13:50 libslang.so.1.4.4 [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/mnt/hurd/lib$ > > > There are still duplicate packages, namely bsdutils and eight flavours of > > > binutils. I am choosing the latest of each pair. > > > > If you're planning on including gcc-2.95, you should get the binutils > > off of alpha (in the devel directory). I'm going to upload these to > > Debian soon, but I lost the changes file, so I have to recompile. =( > > I choose nothing if I can help it ;) It is 2.95. > > I am using the binutils from alpha. Stupid me, that is where the > duplicates are coming from. I have been merging alpha with the main > archive before looking at the componants. Some of the other binutils might be cross-binutils as well.
