Quoth Marcus Brinkmann: > Right. Same for /usr/X11R6/man and /usr/X11R6/include. It should be easy.
<X11/whatever.h> is actually a bit of a different reason. There would be no problem having .h files with the same names here, just like <time.h> and <sys/time.h>. Anyway I think we can conclude that all _should_ be fine and dandy, but I won't believe it until I actually see it. (I think I'll have to leave work early today...) > IMHO, the LSB/FHS people should quiver in their boots because of the > whole /usr/X11R6 excemption. We are just correcting some historical bugs > here. Agreed. Separate subtrees are nice if you use make install and rm -Rf as your packaging system, but really just a bit silly when we have dpkg and rpm. > When we have some experience with it, I will try to build some Debian X > packages with prefix "" (thanks, Roland) and a few symlinks corrected. > Branden is also interested in this, so we might as well do some leg work. > It would really be cleaner for us this way. Would Branden actually consider something to the effects of a /usr/X11R6 -> . symlink? Oystein -- settrans / /hurd/crash
