Neal H Walfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Passive translator are connected to the inode. Thus, if we have two > hard links to a translator, what is the current working directory? We > just do not know.
I agree that makes it harder to do the Right Thing (as well as figuring out what that is ;-) > So, in conclusion to fix this, you need to change the interface to > fshelp_fetch_root to pass a port to the current working directory and > change a few callers. Personally, I would welcome this change. Hmm, now I've tried reading the kode. dir-lookup.c, fetch-root.c and start-translator-long.c. I figure the "current" directory is the dnp variable in dir_lookup, right? But I don't understand how the cwd, or other ports like stdio, are set for the new process. > You have one of those weird characters in your name and it is messing > my mutt up. I always realize after I send a message to you. Sorry about that. I use the from address "[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Niels M�ller)". I find it a little odd that a MUA parses an rfc 822 _comment_ for mail addresses in that way. Regards, /Niels
