On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 11:41:56PM -0600, Adam Majer wrote: > > > Is there a need for a Hurd autobuilder? I noticed that there are a > > > great deal of packages out of date for Hurd.... > > > > I've got an autobuilder here that is turned off while we prepare to do > > an ABI change. When that is complete, package building will resume. > > What is ABI?
Google and dict will likely give you a more concise answer than I will. > > Are you a current Debian Developer? If yes, we will need help during > > this ABI change. We will be manually rebuilding [0] every package > > that is currently in the Hurd archive and probably uploading in one > > pass. > > I see. Do you know when this will happen? I am currently in NM queue. > Maybe I should hurry my AM to get the package check done :) I'll > email him tomorrow... Hurrying a volunteer is never a good idea. Especially one that can deny you access to something. We're sometime away from the ``rebuild party''. > Yes, sbuild is good... But is there a way of convincing anyone that > the logs produced in build should be posted onto buildd.debian.org.. > I am not talking about in "corner" somewhere but it would be very > nice to have them listed under "packages for each developer".. For > example, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is the right person to talk about what you want on buildd.debian.org. -- Tofu - The other white meat.
