* Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020513 19:07]: > Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > The trouble with the GNU term is that GNU/Linux and GNU/Mach are terms
I hate typos, my brain slipped. I shouldn't be a tech writer unless given time to check things over at least three times. > GNU/Mach is not being promoted by anyone, and should not be used. > > There is GNU Mach--that is just the GNU distribution of Mach, similar > to GNU Emacs, which is the GNU distribution of Emacs. > > There is GNU/Hurd, which is a variant of the GNU system that uses the > Hurd (and currently Mach, though that may change someday) as its > basis. It is also correct to call GNU/Hurd just by the name GNU. Right, Debian promotes this. > GNU/Linux is the variant of the GNU system that uses the Linux kernel. Correct, sorry for any confusion this may have caused. -- -- Grant Bowman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
