[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > * Robert Millan writes: > > very interesting. you mean like, *fs, proc and auth will be treated as > > separate components of the system? maybe there could be a package for > > each, so they can be handled/upgraded separately. does that technicaly > > make sense? > > They are already separate components of the system. The official > Hurd package will contain the "official" versions of each such > translator. A user may write their own replacement for such > translators. I think it would be quite annoying to have to upgrade > each translator manually like that. > I think it would be not a bad idea to ship them as separate packages. This way one could install a 'replacement' pacakge for any of them. And for ease of upgrade: There does nothing speak against a hurd meta-package IMHO...
Regards, Andy -- Andreas Rottmann | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.8ung.at/rotty | GnuPG Key: http://www.8ung.at/rotty/gpg.asc Fingerprint | DFB4 4EB4 78A4 5EEE 6219 F228 F92F CFC5 01FD 5B62 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
