On Sat, 18 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > One has to prove they can follow the current standard, before attempting to > > change. > > Could you please give me the standard describing how to port Debian to > another operating system? I couldn't find it, but of course I'm just a > random fool and you're God, so you can probably give me the url.
There is none, and you know it. That has nothing to do with what I said. The current standard is how Debian functions. hurd should be molded to fit Debian, not Debian molded to fit hurd. Modifying Debian to work with hurd, means that *ALL* other ports of Debian need to be modified. Is that what you really want? Can you honestly suggest this course of action? > > > And, hurd has not even done that. > > Done what? Being compatible with Linux? That won't happen. Who said anything about Linux? This is *Debian* you must be compatible with. I am not surprised that you attempt to misdirect this pointless thread with more pointlessness, by saying that this is an argument about hurd and Linux. > > Once we see that they can fit in with the rest of Debian, then hurd will be > > given the credence it desires. Until then, most requests will fall on deaf > > ears. > > I doubt the Hurd can fit i with the rest of Debian. We need a lot of > changes for that, especially in the attitude of the cabals, I don't > think that will ever happen. The hurd cabals, maybe. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
