On Sun, 19 May 2002, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > Try GNU/Hurd. > > This is Debian. > > Debian is going to be released. > > Release time is an "emergency", where people in Debian > > are required to be concentrated on releasing something useful. [...] > If you are claiming that GNU/Hurd isn't Debian, then start a proposal > to remove the hurd-i386 port. If the majority of the Debian Developers > want to see the Hurd port go away, I don't think most Debian GNU/Hurd > people will continue if that is the result, because it's wasting time > anyhow (well, it already was for 3 years).
I'm starting to have the feeling that you're missing some important part of your brain, but just in case: Nobody's saying The Hurd can't ditch the Debian Way. However, if The Hurd wants to stay part of Debian, it can not do so. Note the difference between 'GNU/Hurd' and 'Debian GNU/Hurd'. -- wouter dot verhelst at advalvas dot be "Human knowledge belongs to the world" -- From the movie "Antitrust" -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
