Anthony Towns wrote: > There's a more general chicken-and-egg problem too: the FHS isn't supposed > to be changed until there's some existing practice to change too; but > otoh it forbids people from introducing new top-level hierarchies to > establish existing practice...
Happily we can override the FHS in policy. I for one would be happy to see a policy proposal from the Hurd people that explains why /hurd is needed instead of existing stuff like /boot or more generally FHS-acceptable stuff like /lib/something, from anyone involved in the Hurd who can refrain from calling the FHS people a pack of fools, and who is capable of carrying on a sensible conversaion. -- see shy jo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
