On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 07:34:48PM +0200, Jeroen Dekkers wrote: > > And there are still enough people who run some non-free OS which is > more insecure than GNU/Hurd.
so? Personally, i am not interested in any of those non-free OS's, and i am barely concerend about the non-Debian distributions. Debian (using a linux, bsd, or gnumach/l4 (micro)kernel) should be ``Secure by default.'' if this means that no firewalling -> no debian release, then so be it. i do know that the hurd uses a different privledge mechanism than linux uses, even if i do not understand the details. that is unimportant. -john i am not subscribed to debian-hurd, hence the To: -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
