On Tue, May 21, 2002 at 12:45:30PM +1200, Philip Charles wrote: > Going by my experience to date I would suggest independent releases with > different release managers. IMHO, this would make life a lot easier. > 1. 0.1 could be released for the Hurd and *BSD and not compromise the > high standard of the GNU/Linux releases. > 2. The release manager could be someone familiar with the particular > platform.
This really isn't particularly dependent on the "new kernel/libc" issue. People intimately familiar with all new architectures are necessary. I'm tempted to strike out the word "new", actually. See the "Ports" section in http://www.debian.org/intro/organization. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
