On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 20:10, Wolfgang J�hrling wrote: > Manuel A. Fern�ndez Montecelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Ter, 2002-05-21 at 18:51, Niels M�ller wrote: > > > I hope there will be a sensible list of release criteria, prepared > > > with input from both the release manager the hurd folks, when Debian > > > GNU/Hurd gets closer to release, and putting FW-tools on that list > > > sounds pretty nonsensical. But I'm happy to postpone that discussion > > > until the list is being prepared and release getting closer. > > > > i agree. well, i really *don't know* if FW-tools are "nonsensical". > > Please note that he didn't say that. He was talking about putting them > on the list.
ops O:) anyway, i think that my previous msg was clear: both (Debian) Hurd folks and the RM (someone familiar with the Hurd) have to decide about release criteria (with FW-tools or not in the list X). the same for *BSD, Linux and so. to release all of them at the same time it requires an extra effort, more than just another architecture, doesn't it? i feel that the overall effort would be too high. (i assume that it was planned for this release to have into account also Hurd, and so AJ talks about FW-tools, installers, etc) > Cheers, > GNU/Wolfgang aburinho!! ________________________________________________________________________ Manuel A. Fern�ndez Montecelo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> GnuPG pubkey: [http://sindominio.net/~manuel/gpg-pubkey.txt]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
