[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes: > There is nothing that prohibits anyone to relocate the translators > from /hurd to /trans or whatever, the point is that they are in > /hurd now and this will not change, and this does not violate the FHS!
Sorry for adding to this pointless thread. Maybe this is a stupid question, but does the FHS determine anywhere that "Thou shalt have no other directories before me"? I'd say that /hurd, /trans, whatever you call it, is simply outside the scope of the FHS and therefore cannot, by definition, conflict with it. Conflicts would arise if GNU/Hurd would reuse common unix directory names for other than the commonly accepted purposes but not if they add something new which is unique to their OS. Johannes -- ~/.signature under construction -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
