On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 10:57:23AM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote: > Please define in what ways the hurd-i386 autobuilding efforts are not > acceptable.
Nononono. "accepted autobuilding" means "automatically building packages from queue/accepted". ie, shortly after they're uploaded rather than some time after they've been put in the archive. You don't need to worry about this until hurd's ready to release. > > ----- Forwarded message from Anthony Towns <[email protected]> ----- > > From: Anthony Towns <[email protected]> > > > > On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:36:07PM +0200, Othmar Pasteka wrote: > > > it's on the todo list for arm as i noticed that lack of feature a > > > few days ago. and well, i never knew that it was a necessary item > > > before woody is released. > > > > It's not. You'll need to fix some stuff up when the > > security-accepted-autobuilding is done, but that's not ready for anyone > > yet. That hurd, arm and m68k aren't doing accepted autobuilding yet for > > unstable is just an interesting factoid, not a problem. Cheers, aj -- Anthony Towns <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://azure.humbug.org.au/~aj/> I don't speak for anyone save myself. GPG signed mail preferred. ``BAM! Science triumphs again!'' -- http://www.angryflower.com/vegeta.gif
pgp3aAs7tDxwo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
