Daniel Borgmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > That sounds like a good plan.
It is our plan, so obviously it must be good. ;-) > I mean, should the translator just be something like a "pipe" to > the video memory or should it already provide drawing functions? Should > it allow access from every application? I don't think it should be a pipe. It should make it possible for applications to map the video buffer into their own memory. In addition to that, it could provide a nice RPC drawing interface. As to who should be able to access it, well, don't we have the file permission bits for that? Cheers, GNU/Wolfgang -- Wolfgang J�hrling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> \\ http://stdio.cjb.net/ Debian GNU/Hurd user && Debian GNU/Linux user \\ http://www.gnu.org/ The Hurd Hacking Guide: http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hacking-guide/ ["We're way ahead of you here. The Hurd has always been on the ] [ cutting edge of not being good for anything." -- Roland McGrath ] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
