On Fri, Oct 11, 2002 at 02:51:25PM -0700, Thomas Bushnell, BSG wrote: > Jeff Bailey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > I didn't really follow the earlier discussions on this - Can you > > remind me what mailing list it was on? The idea of libexec being in a > > Hurd annex seems silly (and something a committee would be unlikely to > > accept if we were storing anything other than Hurd-specific binaries > > in there), so I'd like to understand more. > > Since it has nothing to do with Debian, it was discussed on bug-hurd.
The discussion forked from a thread about LD_LIBRARY_PATH on help-hurd. The discussion about the FHS started around http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/help-hurd/2002-March/005437.html I was merging people's comments into a draft, the latest version of which is available at: http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/help-hurd/2002-May/005960.html I didn't want to submit this to the FHS discussion list unless there was agreement about the content; also it needs need to be typeset in groff :( -- Richard Kreuter
