On Tue, Dec 17, 2002 at 12:42:59PM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > I support the addition of ssh, *even* with a weak random. > > There was never any talk about removing ssh. > > Now, what's current best practice? We use this: > http://kilobug.free.fr/hurd/random-64.tar.gz > Is there a better alternative(s)? > > Or you can copy /bin/bash to /dev/urandom, they are just about equally > secure.
are you sure about that? I think that it's a stupid flame...Why there are problems to enhace GNU/Hurd? Sooner or later hurd/random(?) server will be added to the base system...why not now? I think that random64 is allways better than a /bin/bash <-- that allways is the same key -_-UU but if you think that a shit of security is better than a bad security... Please, don't enlarge this flame. Just think about enhace GNU/Hurd..I think that this project will never advance if we allways say: "Actually there's more important things to do", I think that there is enought people working on GNU/Hurd to make an stable system. But I feel important to work on a lot of front lines will be better. Sorry if I seems aggresive. I only express my opinion. > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- ;---- ----; ; invokespecial java/lang/Object/<init>()V ; ;---- ----;
