Neal a �crit : >> > Your argument is absurd. Network security considerations are different >> > than local system security considerations. We have control over who can >> > have an account on our systems. We don't necessarily have control over >> > who has access to our IP ports. >> >> These are all excellent reasons to accurately describe the state of >> the system. >> >> None of them are reasons to remove functionality.
> Which is why your argument is absurd: no one is suggesting that any > software be *removed*. The question is: do we `ln -s /bin/bash > /dev/random' by default. No, we should use a random translator, which, at least, provide uniform numbers, and differents number on successive reads. -- Gael Le Mignot "Kilobug" - [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://kilobug.free.fr GSM : 06.71.47.18.22 (in France) ICQ UIN : 7299959 Fingerprint : 1F2C 9804 7505 79DF 95E6 7323 B66B F67B 7103 C5DA Member of HurdFr: http://hurdfr.org - The GNU Hurd: http://hurd.gnu.org
