OPenSSH: is freely useable and re-useable by everyone under a BSD license.
LSH: A GNU implementation of the Secure Shell protocols. I think that LSH is more correct on hurd because the license (GPLvsBSD) there are many random translators, but I think that anybody says that will build the debian package... It really exists? On Fri, Feb 28, 2003 at 11:26:42AM +0100, Alfred M. Szmidt wrote: > Why not use lsh instead of OpenSsh? I think that in hurd project > there are more political reasons than security ones. > > Both are Free Software correct? Then there are no "political" reasons > to prefer the one over the other. But lsh is _still_ useless on > GNU/Hurd since no good source of random bits exists... -- ;---- ----; ; invokespecial java/lang/Object/<init>()V ; ;---- ----;
