Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 19 Oct 2003 22:28:17 +0200 (CEST)
From: Santiago Vila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.5 required=4.0
tests=LDOSUBSCRIBER,PATCH_UNIFIED_DIFF,USER_AGENT_PINE
version=2.55-lists.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55-lists.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)
Resent-From: [email protected]
X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/15108
X-Loop: [email protected]
Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello.
Robert has updated both gcc-defaults and the gcc compilers, which means
gcc-3.3 is now the default compiler if you use gcc and we are now mostly
in sync with the Linux-based architectures.
Before I update the cheap gcc-i386-gnu cross-compiler acccordingly:
Are the gnumach and hurd packages really ready for gcc-3.3?
Another question: Now, when compiling a very simple program (hello)
the following message is shown:
dpkg-architecture: warning: Unknown gcc system type i586-gnu, falling back to
default (native compilation)
dpkg-architecture: warning: Specified GNU system type i386-gnu does not match
gcc system type i586-gnu.
The following patch to dpkg-architecture seems to remove the warning:
--- /usr/bin/dpkg-architecture 2003-09-20 03:06:39.000000000 +0200
+++ dpkg-architecture 2003-10-19 21:59:16.000000000 +0200
@@ -61,7 +61,7 @@
'sh3eb', 'sh3eb-linux',
'sh4eb', 'sh4eb-linux',
'hppa', 'hppa-linux',
- 'hurd-i386', 'i386-gnu',
+ 'hurd-i386', 'i586-gnu',
's390', 's390-linux',
's390x', 's390x-linux',
'ia64', 'ia64-linux',
Is this really the right thing to do?
Thanks.
No, fix sub rewrite_gnu to something like (.*linux|.*gnu).
Jim
