On 16 Mar 2005, Thomas Bushnell BSG wrote:
> Philip Charles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > There is a major difference between the GNU/Hurd and all the Linux and
> > BSD ports. We are creating a new os.
>
> Right, but it wouldn't be unfair for Debian to say that the purpose of
> Debian is something else. So we can use the Debian infrastructure,
> but it's not unreasonable for Debian to have a different interest
> here.
>
> Even if we don't meet the SCC requirements, that doesn't mean we are
> dropped from Debian, it just means we have to set up our own archive.
> That might not be a bad thing anyway, but it would be more work and a
> change.
Generally agree, but I think that the decision about GNU/Hurd should be
made on the basis of it being a new os under development, and not the
criteria set up for mature os's and their ports.
Phil.
--
Philip Charles; 39a Paterson Street, Abbotsford, Dunedin, New Zealand
+64 3 488 2818 Fax +64 3 488 2875 Mobile 025 267 9420
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - preferred. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I sell GNU/Linux & GNU/Hurd CDs & DVDs. See http://www.copyleft.co.nz
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
